quarta-feira, 8 de julho de 2015

Tensión iglesia-estado nubla visita del papa a Bolivia

Tensión iglesia-estado nubla visita del papa a Bolivia

La Paz, Bolivia.- El papa Francisco cerraba el miércoles el primer tramo de su gira latinoamericana por tres países, tras hacer una apasionada petición de que se instaure un nuevo orden económico y ecológico en el que los recursos naturales sean compartidos por todos y no sólo explotados por los ricos.

Francisco visitará a varios ancianos y ofrecerá una charla a sacerdotes locales antes de volar a Bolivia, donde el medio ambiente, la atención a los pobres y la tensa relación entre el gobierno y la Iglesia católica, están entre los temas más destacados en su agenda.

El presidente boliviano, Evo Morales, un indígena aimara conocido por su retórica socialista y antiimperialista, recibirá a Francisco en el aeropuerto y le acompañará para un discurso ante autoridades y diplomáticos locales, antes de que el pontífice viaje a la ciudad boliviana de Santa Cruz. La parada en La Paz se reducirá a cuatro horas para evitar al papa, de 78 años, una larga exposición a la extenuante altitud de 4 mil metros a la que se encuentra la ciudad.

Francisco y Morales han coincidido en varias ocasiones, la última en octubre cuando el presidente, un excampesino cocalero, participó en una cumbre en el Vaticano de grupos indígenas y defensores de los pobres, dos comunidades defendidas porFrancisco. Ambos comparten la creencia de que los países ricos deben cambiar de dirección de forma drástica para combatir el cambio climático, aunque les separan las iniciativas anticlericales de Morales, que han agriado las relaciones entre el Estado y la Iglesia en Bolivia.

Tras su paso por La Paz, el papa pasará el resto de su estancia en Bolivia en Santa Cruz, donde celebrará otro encuentro con grupos de bases y visitará a los internos de la violenta prisión de Palmasola. Después viajará a Paraguay.

Evo Morales y su relación con la iglesia católica

El presidente de Bolivia, Evo Morales, es un gran seguidor del papa Francisco y dijo que no podría estar más feliz de que ambos estén de acuerdo en que el capitalismo fomenta la desigualdad social y deja a los pobres atrás.

Pero hasta que Francisco fue elegido como papa en 2013 (e incluso ahora, aunque en menor grado) su gobierno ha tenido una accidentada relación con la Iglesiacatólica.

En cuanto Morales asumió el cargo en 2006, la Biblia y la cruz fueron retiradas del palacio presidencial. Una nueva constitución en 2009 hizo del país, de mayoría católica, un estado secular. Y en las ceremonias oficiales del estado, los ritos andinos sustituyeron a los católicos.

Todo ello plantea el escenario para un interesante vaivén diplomático el miércoles, cuando Francisco aterrice en la capital de Bolivia para una visita oficial. Morales le recibirá en el aeropuerto y después le acompañará a un encuentro con autoridades y diplomáticos locales.

La directora regional de CAFOD, la agencia humanitaria católica inglesa, Clare Dixon, señaló que la actitud combativa de Morales contra la Iglesia, a la que ve como un desafío a su autoridad, ha creado algunos retos. Además, señaló, la Iglesia cuestiona algunas de las decisiones tomadas por Bolivia en materia de desarrollo.

Sin embargo, ha sembrado malestar entre los nativos de las tierras bajas al fomentar una autopista que cruza una reserva natural y autorizar explotaciones de gas y petróleo en zonas salvajes. Elogiado por los ecologistas en el extranjero por sus reclamaciones de que los países ricos más por combatir el calentamiento global, en su país recibe críticas, también de activistas en la Iglesia, que le acusan de anteponer la extracción de gas y petróleo a mantener el agua y los bosques limpios.

Mario Gutiérrez, un especialista medioambiental en Bolivia que trabaja con la organización benéfica católica Cáritas, señaló que el gobierno de Morales envenena a comunidades indígenas y deforesta hábitats importantes para estas poblaciones. LaIglesia, señaló, está preocupada.

Abundan las fuentes de conflicto entre el presidente y la Iglesia
Morales considera a la Iglesia católica como un poderoso vestigio de la servidumbre de la era colonial, de la que los indígenas (más del 60 por ciento de la población boliviana) aún tratan de recuperarse.

El gobierno hizo obligatoria la enseñanza de otras religiones en las escuelas además del catolicismo, que profesan casi cuatro de cada cinco bolivianos. Pero perdió una sonada disputa cuando intentó prohibir la educación católica obligatoria en el 15 por ciento de escuelas gestionadas por la Iglesia.

En plena polémica, Morales acusó al cardenal Julio Terrazas, entonces presidente de la conferencia episcopal de Bolivia, de estar de acuerdo con la oposición y le despojó de su pasaporte diplomático.

Ahora, todas las ceremonias oficiales en el país se ven precedidas de rituales en honor de la diosa madre tierra andina, Pachamama.

Eso no sienta bien en la jerarquía eclesiástica boliviana, que en una cara pastoral enviada en 2012 describía como "un error y una desviación" la existencia de textos escolares que se referían a Pachamama como una divinidad.

Morales se describe como católico y dice creer, como muchos indígenas andinos, que hay espacio de sobra para las creencias cristianas y tradicionales.

"Yo sigo convencido que los bolivianos tenemos doble religión, doble fe. Somos católicos pero igual hacemos nuestros ritos", señaló.

Morales nunca esconde lo que piensa. Cuando en 2010 se reunió con el predecesor de Francisco, Benedicto XVI, le entregó una carta sugiriendo la abolición del celibato de los clérigos y que se permitiera a las mujeres ordenarse como sacerdotes.

La actitud del presidente hacia el Vaticano cambió de forma radical cuando Franciscose convirtió en papa. Ha visitado al pontífice en dos ocasiones y le invitó a visitarBolivia.

La semana pasada, Morales comentó en la inauguración de una escuela queFrancisco y él están de acuerdo en muchos aspectos políticos, en lo social y en lo económico
.

La justicia falló a favor del Municipio en conflicto con maleteros

El informe lo dio a conocer la comuna a través de un comunicado.El informe lo dio a conocer la comuna a través de un comunicado.
El Asesor Letrado Municipal Ricardo Medrano dio a conocer ayer la sentencia de la justicia con relación a la primera de las 14 causas iniciadas en el año 2014 por un grupo de maleteros contra el Gobierno Municipal. En este primer juicio, el actor reclamó 800 mil pesos por entender que existía una relación de dependencia con la empresa Vía Bariloche, y que el Municipio sería co-responsable como titular de la terminal de ómnibus.
El funcionario municipal dio a conocer el fallo a favor de la Municipalidad de San Carlos de Bariloche con relación al reclamo de Escudero Molina, quien aseguró haberse desempeñado en tareas de carga y descarga de los ómnibus de Vía Bariloche en la terminal de ómnibus.
“La sentencia ha sido contundentemente favorable para el Municipio ya que desestimó por completo las pretensiones del maletero contra el Estado Municipal”, aseveró Medrano.
El fallo de ayer refiere a uno de los 14 juicios, en el cual se reclaman cerca de 800 mil pesos en concepto de capital. En este sentido, la justicia desestimó por completo la demanda, sosteniendo que no existió relación de empleo con el Municipio, dejando ajeno al Gobierno local de toda responsabilidad vinculada al presente juicio.
“Para nosotros es un noticia tranquilizadora que ratifica la buena visión que ha tenido la señora intendente María Eugenia Martini desde el primer momento que estalló el conflicto. Ella ofreció y articuló todos los recursos a su alcance para que el Municipio colaborara con una solución. No porque seamos parte sino porque entendió que era una situación de enorme repercusión social y porque había gente con necesidades de trabajo y de generar ingresos por lo que había que ayudarlas”, manifestó el funcionario.
Medrano recordó que esta situación se inició cuando los maleteros tomaron una medida de fuerza a fines de mayo de 2013, producto de la precariedad laboral en la que se encontraban y la falta de ingresos, causada por un paro del transporte de larga distancia. “La intendenta Martini puso a la cabeza de la resolución del conflicto al Gobierno Municipal, mediando para que levanten la medida e iniciando un proceso de formalización del servicio que brindan a las empresas”, aseguró Medrano.
Como consecuencia de ello, el Poder Ejecutivo envió un proyecto de ordenanza para poner como condición para la explotación de los boxes en la Terminal, que las empresas contraten el servicio de una Cooperativa de Trabajo integrada exclusivamente por los maleteros. Dicha Ordenanza fue sancionada por el Concejo Deliberante (Ordenanza Nº 2416-CM-13) y promulgada por el Ejecutivo, y en su virtud, el Ejecutivo acompañó, asistió y colaboró a los maleteros en la constitución de la Cooperativa, por lo que desde la Municipalidad, junto con el INAES, “los asesoramos y capacitamos con personal de la Asesoría Letrada, acompañándolos en la conformación de la Cooperativa Islas Malvinas”.
Aclaró luego el letrado que el camino de solución consensuado entre maleteros, municipio y empresas de transporte se interrumpió cuando los maleteros se retiraron del acuerdo porque entendían que había una relación de empleo con las empresas de transporte y responsabilidad del municipio, interponiendo un reclamo patrimonial de envergadura. Al no lograrse acordar sobre este punto, el Municipio se mantuvo firme sobre su ajenidad al vínculo invocado por los maleteros como así también a toda responsabilidad a dicho respecto, lo cual desembocó en la judicialización del conflicto por parte de los reclamantes.
Medrano señaló la predisposición del Municipio a colaborar dentro de sus posibilidades, y sostuvo que “siempre el Gobierno de la licenciada Martini estuvo dispuesto y puso a disposición todos los recursos a su alcance para que este conflicto se solucionara por otra vía y no por una vía judicial”.

Macri en Avellaneda: diálogo con vecinos y capacitación a fiscales

“Toda la energía y la alegría que ustedes expresan acá está ocurriendo en todo el país, donde hay voluntad de progresar y de cambiar la realidad para bien”, sostuvo Macri tras charlar con los fiscales en la sede de PRO de Avellaneda.
 
Dijo que “todas las ganas que tenemos de que en la Argentina haya un progreso compartido y un proyecto que nos permita salir adelante requiere que vayamos a votar, pero también que haya argentinos que se ocupen de defender el voto”.

 
A su vez, González señaló que “la seguridad es la principal demanda de los vecinos de Avellaneda como también el deseo de que se genere más empleo” y dijo, en ese sentido, que “acá hay mucha energía, una enorme expectativa y la gente apuesta al cambio”.

 
Macri y González realizaron un timbreo por el centro de Avellaneda para charlar con los vecinos, luego de visitar a una estudiante de secundaria de 16 años y a una ama de casa de 44, madre de cuatro hijos, quien le manifestó su deseo de ser fiscal en las elecciones de este año.

Serbian PM to attend 20th anniversary of Srebrenica massacre

Prime Minister Aleksandar Vucic of Serbia said Tuesday he would attend the 20th anniversary commemoration of the Srebrenica massacre this weekend in a bid to forge reconciliation.

"It is time to show that we are ready for reconciliation and that we are ready to bow our head before other peoples' victims," Vucic told reporters.
"That is why the Serbian government tonight decided that as prime minister, I would represent the Republic of Serbia in Srebrenica on July 11," he said.
Nearly 8,000 Muslim boys and men were killed by Bosnian Serb forces after Srebrenica was overrun on July 11, 1995.
"I will go proudly and represent Serbia... which is able to admit that some individuals committed crimes," Vucic said.
"These people have names. We condemn each one of these horrible crimes and will sentence each of these criminals," he promised.
The killing occurred shortly before the end of the 1992-1995 Bosnian war, which claimed some 100,000 lives.
It was the worst massacre to occur on European soil since World War II.
Serbian and Bosnian Serb politicians have long denied the scale of the killing, although two international tribunals have described the bloodshed as genocide.
In 2005, then Serbian president Boris Tadic attended ceremonies marking the massacre's 10th anniversary, becoming the first leader from his country to visit the site.
In 2010 the Serbian parliament move condemned the massacre, and three years later Serbian President Tomislav Nikolic issued a personal apology.
However, all Serbian leaders – including Vucic, a former ultranationalist-turned-pro-European – have persistently refused to describe the massacre as genocide.
Belgrade is upset with a British attempt to have the UN Security Council pass a resolution which says recognition of genocide "is a prerequisite for reconciliation."
The Security Council pushed back a vote on the motion until Wednesday after Russia threatened to wield its veto.
Vucic said he had received "guarantees" from Russian leaders that a resolution that would be "accusatory" towards Serbia would be blocked.
Ties between Bosnia and Serbia have been fragile since the war, during which Belgrade backed Bosnian Serb forces. Last month Vucic said he wanted to improve relations with Sarajevo.

The main players in Act II of Greece’s debt tragedy

From the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund, to France and Germany, each player has a particular role in post-referendum Greece, but what exactly? FRANCE 24 takes a look at what’s at stake for each.
Among all the contradictory signals, it’s hard to comprehend exactly what’s going on in Europe following Greece’s referendum this past weekend. To help understand Act II of Greece’s debt tragedy, FRANCE 24 breaks down the roles of the main players and what’s at stake for each.
European Central Bank (ECB). The ECB holds Greece’s future in its hands. The country’s banks have been able to survive up until now thanks to a string of emergency loans from the financial institution.
The ECB decided on Monday that it will continue to support Greece’s banking system. The move couldn’t have come at a more critical moment: after Greeks voted overwhelmingly against more austerity in Sunday’s referendum, Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras made shoring up the country’s banks his No. 1 priority and pledged that the banks would open again within 48 hours of the referendum.
But Greece’s banking system, which has only about €500 million left in its reserves, wouldn’t have lasted long without the ECB’s help. If the financial institution had decided to cut Greece off instead, the possibility of Greece leaving the eurozone, in a so-called “Grexit”, could have become a reality. In order to save the country from insolvency, Greece’s central bank would have had to provide emergency funding to banks, which would require printing cash – something the country can’t do as long as it remains in the eurozone.
In any case, the ECB alone cannot force Greece to choose between bankruptcy and leaving the euro. What’s more, the financial institution demonstrated that it is unwilling to take on such a responsibility during Ireland’s banking crisis in November 2010. Which means Greece will have to wait and see what happens during Tuesday’s emergency eurozone summit before it makes a decision.
France. With Greece and Germany at loggerheads, France has found itself caught in the middle. The country’s role is a pivotal one: it must bring Greece and Germany to the negotiating table by helping them to look beyond their past disputes.
In an effort to re-establish dialogue between the two countries, French President François Hollandemet with German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Monday evening. France has sought to mediate the situation by adopting a conciliatory tone towards Greece while also appearing to be on the same page as Germany. “In this Europe, there is room for solidarity… but also responsibility,” Hollande said.
French Finance Minister Michel Sapin has followed a similar tack. On Monday, he told Europe 1 radio that while Greece’s rejection of Sunday’s referendum was not a threat to negotiations, “there’s not much room to maneuver”. Sapin has indicated that he is open to “lightening” Greece’s debt load, but on the condition that the country come up with “serious and solid propositions”.
Germany. German Chancellor Angela Merkel is in a tricky situation. On the one hand, she can’t ignore the fact that most German politicians and a portion of the public are tired of hearing about Greece. On the other hand, she risks going down in history as the chancellor that oversaw Greece’s exit from the eurozone if she continues down the path she’s on.
This is not the legacy Merkel wants to leave behind, having stood up to hawks within her own government, like Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaüble, on more than one occasion since 2010 to help Greece.
Following her meeting with French President François Hollande on Monday, Merkel was firm on the issue of Greece, but said that the “door remained open to discussion”. She added that the conditions to launch new “negotiations” had not yet been met, saying that it was up to Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras to make “precise” proposals.
Earlier in the day Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel, who is also head of the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD), adopted a more intransigent tone. He said that Tsipras had “burned the last bridge” with the European Union, adding that he found it “difficult to imagine” new negotiations.
Even the resignation and replacement of Greece’s combative Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis – largely seen as a conciliatory gesture forced by Tsipras – did little to assuage Germany’s government, which let it be known that the problem “wasn’t a question of personnel, but of conviction”.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). For the time being, Greece and the rest of Europe have little interest in the IMF getting involved in post-referendum negotiations.
The financial institution has been unpredictable ever since Christine Lagarde took it over 2011, its interests sometimes aligning with Greece, other times with its creditors.
Some European leaders are still angry with the IMF for publishing an internal analysis just two days before Sunday’s referendum signaling that debt relief should be a key component of any bailout package to rescue the Greek economy. Greece’s government used the report to justify voting “No” in the referendum.
But the IMF is no friend of Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras either. The institution launched an administrative procedure to evaluate whether Greece should remain a part of the IMF and how it can it repay its debt after the country officially fell into arrears on June 30. The Greek government can now expect to face greater pressure to reform pensions or increase the VAT – two of the IMF’s pet issues.
European CommissionEuropean Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker had little to say in the wake of Greece’s referendum. He had campaigned hard for a “Yes” vote, so the outcome was in some ways a personal defeat. Juncker is expected to break his silence on the issue on Tuesday.
In the meantime, there are some who have questioned whether the Greek debt crisis has undermined the European Commission instead of reinforcing its role at the heart of Europe’s institutions. When asked on Monday whether the Greek referendum could result in Juncker’s resignation, Jeroen Dijsselbloem, who presides over an informal body of eurozone finance ministers known as the Eurogroup, declined to comment.
The European Commission appeared to lose all control over the Greek debt crisis after German Chancellor Angela Merkel called for an emergency eurozone summit on Tuesday. In this context, it looks as though Juncker is the referendum’s main victim.

This article has been translated from the original in French.Fund, to France and Germany, each player has a particular role in post-referendum Greece, but what exactly? FRANCE 24 takes a look at what’s at stake for each.

Among all the contradictory signals, it’s hard to comprehend exactly what’s going on in Europe following Greece’s referendum this past weekend. To help understand Act II of Greece’s debt tragedy, FRANCE 24 breaks down the roles of the main players and what’s at stake for each.
European Central Bank (ECB). The ECB holds Greece’s future in its hands. The country’s banks have been able to survive up until now thanks to a string of emergency loans from the financial institution.
The ECB decided on Monday that it will continue to support Greece’s banking system. The move couldn’t have come at a more critical moment: after Greeks voted overwhelmingly against more austerity in Sunday’s referendum, Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras made shoring up the country’s banks his No. 1 priority and pledged that the banks would open again within 48 hours of the referendum.
But Greece’s banking system, which has only about €500 million left in its reserves, wouldn’t have lasted long without the ECB’s help. If the financial institution had decided to cut Greece off instead, the possibility of Greece leaving the eurozone, in a so-called “Grexit”, could have become a reality. In order to save the country from insolvency, Greece’s central bank would have had to provide emergency funding to banks, which would require printing cash – something the country can’t do as long as it remains in the eurozone.
In any case, the ECB alone cannot force Greece to choose between bankruptcy and leaving the euro. What’s more, the financial institution demonstrated that it is unwilling to take on such a responsibility during Ireland’s banking crisis in November 2010. Which means Greece will have to wait and see what happens during Tuesday’s emergency eurozone summit before it makes a decision.
France. With Greece and Germany at loggerheads, France has found itself caught in the middle. The country’s role is a pivotal one: it must bring Greece and Germany to the negotiating table by helping them to look beyond their past disputes.
In an effort to re-establish dialogue between the two countries, French President François Hollandemet with German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Monday evening. France has sought to mediate the situation by adopting a conciliatory tone towards Greece while also appearing to be on the same page as Germany. “In this Europe, there is room for solidarity… but also responsibility,” Hollande said.
French Finance Minister Michel Sapin has followed a similar tack. On Monday, he told Europe 1 radio that while Greece’s rejection of Sunday’s referendum was not a threat to negotiations, “there’s not much room to maneuver”. Sapin has indicated that he is open to “lightening” Greece’s debt load, but on the condition that the country come up with “serious and solid propositions”.
Germany. German Chancellor Angela Merkel is in a tricky situation. On the one hand, she can’t ignore the fact that most German politicians and a portion of the public are tired of hearing about Greece. On the other hand, she risks going down in history as the chancellor that oversaw Greece’s exit from the eurozone if she continues down the path she’s on.
This is not the legacy Merkel wants to leave behind, having stood up to hawks within her own government, like Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaüble, on more than one occasion since 2010 to help Greece.
Following her meeting with French President François Hollande on Monday, Merkel was firm on the issue of Greece, but said that the “door remained open to discussion”. She added that the conditions to launch new “negotiations” had not yet been met, saying that it was up to Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras to make “precise” proposals.
Earlier in the day Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel, who is also head of the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD), adopted a more intransigent tone. He said that Tsipras had “burned the last bridge” with the European Union, adding that he found it “difficult to imagine” new negotiations.
Even the resignation and replacement of Greece’s combative Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis – largely seen as a conciliatory gesture forced by Tsipras – did little to assuage Germany’s government, which let it be known that the problem “wasn’t a question of personnel, but of conviction”.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). For the time being, Greece and the rest of Europe have little interest in the IMF getting involved in post-referendum negotiations.
The financial institution has been unpredictable ever since Christine Lagarde took it over 2011, its interests sometimes aligning with Greece, other times with its creditors.
Some European leaders are still angry with the IMF for publishing an internal analysis just two days before Sunday’s referendum signaling that debt relief should be a key component of any bailout package to rescue the Greek economy. Greece’s government used the report to justify voting “No” in the referendum.
But the IMF is no friend of Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras either. The institution launched an administrative procedure to evaluate whether Greece should remain a part of the IMF and how it can it repay its debt after the country officially fell into arrears on June 30. The Greek government can now expect to face greater pressure to reform pensions or increase the VAT – two of the IMF’s pet issues.
European CommissionEuropean Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker had little to say in the wake of Greece’s referendum. He had campaigned hard for a “Yes” vote, so the outcome was in some ways a personal defeat. Juncker is expected to break his silence on the issue on Tuesday.
In the meantime, there are some who have questioned whether the Greek debt crisis has undermined the European Commission instead of reinforcing its role at the heart of Europe’s institutions. When asked on Monday whether the Greek referendum could result in Juncker’s resignation, Jeroen Dijsselbloem, who presides over an informal body of eurozone finance ministers known as the Eurogroup, declined to comment.
The European Commission appeared to lose all control over the Greek debt crisis after German Chancellor Angela Merkel called for an emergency eurozone summit on Tuesday. In this context, it looks as though Juncker is the referendum’s main victim.
This article has been translated from the original in French.

terça-feira, 7 de julho de 2015

16ª edição do Moto Chico inicia nesta quinta-feira (9) em Petrolina, PE

Moto Chico acontece há 15 anos (Foto: Reprodução/TV Grande Rio)
O ‘Moto Chico’, um dos principais eventos dedicados aos motociclistas do Nordeste, será realizado em Petrolina, no Sertão de Pernambuco, a partir desta quinta-feira (9). O encontro está na sua 16ª edição e deve seguir a proposta de agradar todos os públicos. A novidade deste ano é o ‘Moto Chico no Velho Chico’, um passeio turístico de barca pelo Rio São Francisco. O evento acontece no Parque Josepha Coelho, na região central da cidade, de 9 a 12 de julho e a entrada é gratuita.
A recepção dos motociclistas começa a partir das 14h da quinta-feira e segue até às 18h. A partir das 19h acontecem shows das bandas gospel A Rede e Ministério Eleve. Na sequência a animação será feita pelo grupo de pop rock local Petrônio Munduri e Banda. Na sexta-feira (10), os shows serão dos grupos OuTrio, Rock ‘n Riders, Bartô Blues Band e Cidades Aparte.
“A gente procura sempre colocar programação eclética porque nosso público não é só de motociclistas, ele é bem variado. Por isso que estão previstas bandas de música gospel, rock e forró”, contou o diretor financeiro da Associação Moto Chico, José Ivanildo Barros dos Santos.
No sábado (11), às 8h, acontece um café da manhã para os motociclistas no Parque Josepha Coelho e parte da Orla de Petrolina a barca ‘Moto Chico no Velho Chico’. O passeio fluvial tem duração aproximada de oito horas e vai levar os cerca de 100 participantes para visitar pontos turísticos locais como a Ilha do Maroto. A excursão terá comidas e bebidas e será ao som de forró pé-de-serra.
Ainda no sábado, quem estiver no Josepha Coelho poderá conferir, a partir das 19h, as apresentações das bandas Mr. Jack, Semivelhos, Rock ‘n Riders e Forró Pega Leve. No último dia do evento, o domingo (12), às 7h acontece a despedida dos motociclistas, às 16h será realizado o show de Fabinho Acústico, e às 20h o encerramento oficial.
Além das apresentações musicais, os visitantes poderão acompanhar as exposições de motocicletas e comprar produtos como capacetes e jaquetas. Durante os quatro dias do evento, 30 mil pessoas devem frequentar o parque.

Nova Semente é roubada pela terceira vez em quatro meses em Petrolina

Unidade do Nova Semente em Petrolina (Foto: Jadir Souza/TV Grande Rio)
Uma unidade do Nova Semente, localizada no bairro Mandacaru, na Zona Norte de Petrolina, no Sertão de Pernambuco, foi arrombada por bandidos na madrugada desta terça-feira (07). Essa é a terceira vez que o local é furtado somente nos últimos quatro meses.
A gestora da unidade, Maria do Socorro Gomes, disse que uma geladeira, um botijão de gás e até alimentos foram levados. Ela diz ainda que não sabe como os bandidos fizeram para levar o material. “Arrombaram uma vez pela porta da frente. Dessa vez foi pela porta dos fundos e agente nunca sabe por onde eles saem. Vê por onde eles entram. Agora foi pelo teto. Arrombaram a porta dos fundos e saíram”, disse.
Bandidos entraram pelo telhado da unidade (Foto: Jadir Souza/TV Grande Rio)Bandidos entraram pelo telhado da unidade
(Foto: Jadir Souza/TV Grande Rio)
Com medo de que os materiais sejam novamente furtados, a gestora tomou algumas medidas. “Os móveis do Nova Semente, como todos sabem, são doações, contribuições dos pais e para conseguir novamente não é tão fácil. O liquidificador industrial foi roubado da última vez, mas não ficam mais aqui. Tem que levar para casa. Eu sempre levo ou a cozinheira. Temos um som também, que a gente tem que levar porque a gente fica com medo deles levarem novamente”, ressalta Maria do Socorro.
Por causa da ação dos bandidos, a unidade ficará sem aula por três dias. “Vamos ficar sem aula mais ou menos por três dias. Hoje vamos fazer uma reunião com os pais para que eles fiquem cientes do que aconteceu e colabore para que a gente compre uma nova geladeira e um botijão. Também estamos providenciando uma cerca elétrica para que haja uma maior dificuldade para que eles entrem aqui”, explica a gestora.